A bill proposed in the Georgia legislature would halt civil asset forfeiture proceedings until the conclusion of any criminal proceedings.
Civil forfeiture is a court process that enables a government entity to seize property and other assets belonging to individuals suspected of committing a crime. The practice has been scrutinized in recent years as advocates for reform have argued that suspicion of criminal activity is not a high enough threshold for seizure of property while supporters of civil forfeiture say the process is imperative for combating organized crime, holding that property and money used in the commission or suspected commission of a crime must be seized to stop the furtherance of criminal activity.
Civil forfeiture allows assets to be seized through the civil courts, which means individuals are not entitled to an appointed attorney and the burden of proof placed on the state is reduced from “beyond a reasonable doubt” to a “balance of probabilities.” Individuals must prove the assets were not used in the commission of or from the profit of criminal activity. That can be difficult to do if criminal proceedings have not concluded.
States like New Mexico, Nebraska, and North Carolina have outlawed the practice of civil forfeiture all together, using only the criminal process to seize assets and property. In Georgia, current practice provides that government entities may wait until the criminal proceedings have concluded, but are not required to do so. The Peach state is among the worst in the nation for enforcement of forfeiture reporting requirements by state and local law enforcement agencies.
House Bill 1086 seeks to amend Georgia law to require that criminal proceedings be concluded before any civil forfeiture proceedings could take place, unless the property owner or interest holder waives the right to wait for criminal proceedings to conclude.
Additionally, the changes would prohibit civil forfeiture proceedings from moving forward in the event of a dismissal or acquittal of criminal charges. Current law allows civil forfeiture proceedings even if a person is acquitting of a crime or charges are dismissed.
The bipartisan measure is sponsored by Representatives Ed Setzler, Chuck Efstration, Calvin Smyre, James Burchett, William Boddie, and Andy Welch.
Another bill, HB 1036, would keep assets that are seized from being distributed to the District Attorney’s office and would instead direct the funds to The Indigent Care Trust Fund and The Safe Harbor for Sexually Exploited Children Fund. You can read that measure here.
The bill has been assigned to the House Judiciary Non-civil Committee. You can read the language below.HB 1086
March 8, 2020 at 4:16 pm
While I am a moderate with right leanings. I’d be surprised if this passes. Conservatives looking standing on the backs of police. And we all know the police unions will lobby hard to stop it.
“But how can you expect us stop stop real criminals without usurping citizens cash and assets for pot luck dinners? They get to go home, it’s not like we put them in prison. They should consider themselves lucky!”