Connect with us

Bulloch Local News

Screven Landfill: AWS Issues Statement on Progress, to Correct Misinformation

The following statement was emailed to AllOnGeorgia by the marketing company representing Atlantic Waste Services on Thursday, July 18, 2019. In the interest of transparency, it has been published in its entirety without editing.

In the email sent to AllOnGeorgia, the marketing company issued this statement:

“A few highlights: Ben Wall states that the Screven County Board of Commissioners and the Screven County Planning and Zoning Commission were wise when they determined to require compliance with the State Act as one of the two conditions for a conditional use in the AG-3 zoning.  The other condition is the site must be geotechnically suitable as determined by the Screven County’s Solid Waste Management Plan.  This site meets both of those criteria.  

This release also sets the record straight on a lot of misinformation that has been circulating, including the types of waste that will not be accepted, groundwater protection, wastewater treatment, gases, height and visual concerns, and more.”

Atlantic Waste Services, Inc. (AWS) has shared several updates regarding its proposed Green Meadows Municipal Solid Waste Disposal and Recycling Facility in Screven County. According to AWS Vice President Ben Wall, the company wants to set the record straight regarding the misinformation and scare tactics that have been circulating, from outdated landfill information to the proposed facility’s height and impact on the community.

“From the beginning, I’ve said that our proposed plans must go through a very long and difficult process,” Wall stated. “It’s important to know the facts about modern lined landfills such as the one that we are proposing. We continue to address the community’s concerns and it is unfortunate that some people have been using scare tactics and misinformation.” he explained. “For example, the Ogeechee River Keeper stated in a letter to the Commissioners that 5 of 22 Municipal landfills in Georgia are classified as Superfund sites. The facts show there are over 50 active, lined landfills in the State of Georgia. Not a single active landfill is on the Superfund list. The 5 landfills referenced by the ORK are old, unlined facilities, some of which date back to the 1880’s. A lot has changed over the years, especially since 1991 when modern landfills became the standard. In fact, a review of data at the EPD shows that there has been not one single detection of a failure in the modern landfill liner systems since the EPD began monitoring them in 1991.”

Wall pointed to the extensive permitting process which must be completed before any site development work can begin. He noted that they “are required to go through the necessary steps with the Screven County Commission regarding a Conditional Use for the property. Then the Georgia Environmental Protection Division (EPD), with oversight from the federal EPA, must conduct a full review before any permits can be issued or work begun at the site.”

Although AWS does not have approval for its Conditional Use request for Green Meadows, the company recently requested third-party testing of the site. Wall said that while this testing was not required at this early stage, he wants to address any concerns that the community may have. Harbin Engineering, P.C. contracted Innovative Engineering Strategies, LLC (IES) to perform the third-party analysis of the Green Meadows site. IES oversaw initial tests to evaluate the geotechnical suitability and the groundwater pollution potential of the site. The initial soil sampling and testing reveal the site is geotechnically suitable for the proposed conditional use of a modern Subtitle D landfill and thus meets the zoning requirement.

In IES’s professional opinion, the likelihood of the modern Subtitle D landfill failing and resulting in groundwater contamination of the water supply for offsite residents and farmers in the vicinity of the proposed landfill is practically impossible because of the depth to groundwater, natural clays and clayey-sands underlying the site, and distance to offsite water supply wells. This is confirmed in the method Georgia EPD will require for review of groundwater pollution potential of a proposed modern landfill. Furthermore, there have been no documented releases from modern landfills in Georgia associated with leachate leakage from the liner, as confirmed in data researched and available at the Georgia EPD Solid Waste Management Program.

Regarding leachate treatment and discharges, AWS has determined that it will not be sending its’ leachate to the City of Sylvania’s wastewater treatment plant. Atlantic Waste plans to collect leachate and treat it onsite through a combination of recirculation and reverse osmosis. By utilizing these processes, there will be no discharges into Brady Branch or the Ogeechee River.

As landfill waste breaks down, the chemical and biological reactions result in the buildup of methane gas. This gas will be collected and directed, via pipes, to either a waste-to-energy facility or a flare system that will convert the methane to carbon dioxide before leaving the facility.

“We understand and respect the concerns that people may have about a landfill of any kind,” Wall said. One concern has been the height of the landfill and how it will impact neighbors. The nearest existing home is 3,660 feet from the proposed landfill footprint and the proposed landfill site is almost completely surrounded by forested land. There are no existing homes anywhere around the property where a home resident has an unobstructed view of the proposed 84-acre landfill site. “Wall added that “with the 200-foot undisturbed buffer and if the landfill were ultimately filled to the proposed 150-foot maximum height above current ground level of the facility, no existing homes or roads around the property will be able to see the top of the landfill unless they are flying overhead, based on drone flights.”

Modern landfills are strictly regulated before they are even built. There are federal and state location restrictions to ensure that landfills are built in suitable geological areas away from faults, wetlands, flood plains or other restricted areas. Independent analysis has already shown the Green Meadows site is compliant with county zoning, state requirements and Screven County’s most recent Solid Waste Management Plan.

Wall pointed to the fact that the proposed Green Meadows facility will have to comply with composite liners requirements. “This will be a modern, lined, Subtitle D, municipal solid waste landfill that can only receive household waste and certain types of nonhazardous waste. This is not going to be a toxic, industrial-waste depository. Some materials may be banned from disposal in this type of landfill, including common household items like paints, cleaners/chemicals, motor oil, batteries, and pesticides or coal ash.”

Additionally, there are misconceptions about medical waste as it relates to this landfill. Medical waste and pharmaceutical waste are two very different waste streams. At no point will harmful, radioactive, infectious waste, chemotherapy, or pharmaceutical waste be allowed at this facility. All medical waste must be treated and sterilized prior to entering the facility, solely for the protection of landfill employees.

Wall further said that the Georgia Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Act, 1990 as amended, has strict requirements and regulations regarding financial assurance:

All solid waste facility owners must have in place financial assurance (money, insurance policy, bonds, etc.) set aside to close the landfill, complete 30 years of post-closure care maintenance and monitoring and any (unlikely) clean-up or corrective action(s) which may be necessary.

“These are just a few examples of the hundreds of pages of regulations in the Georgia Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Act, 1990, as amended. It’s very clear that the siting, design, permitting, construction, operation, monitoring, closure and post closure of a municipal solid waste disposal and recycling facility is a detailed, expensive and regulatory intensive project.”

Wall added that the Screven County Board of Commissioners and the Screven County Planning and Zoning Commission were wise when they determined to require compliance with the State Act as one of the two conditions for a conditional use in the AG-3 zoning. The other condition is the site must be geotechnically suitable as determined by the Screven County’s Solid Waste Management Plan. This site meets both of those criteria.


AWS announced that it planned to develop an 84-acre facility on the 1,000-acre site of the Green Meadows Dairy and that the remaining 900-plus acres will be managed as required buffers with other acreage that will continue to be utilized as active agricultural land for the foreseeable future.

AWS is in the final stages of negotiations to purchase the property which is currently owned by United AG, LLC. The property has been operating as the 1,500-head Green Meadows Dairy for about six years.

On May 28, AWS voluntarily hosted a public information meeting at Screven County High School. Screven County currently produces nearly 40 tons of garbage per day which is then hauled to a landfill outside of the county. Having a local, in-county Landfill will provide a shorter haul distance, reducing hauling cost.

Since the May 28 meeting, AWS has been committed to listening to concerns and updating the public through advertising, social media, one on one meetings, and other efforts.

AWS submitted a request on July 9 for a Conditional Use Permit in AG-3 zoning for a municipal solid waste disposal and recycling facility. The permit request noted that Ben Wall is the authorized agent for AWS and has signed a contract to purchase the subject property from the owner, United Ag, LLC.

For more information from AWS regarding the Green Meadows property, visit

Jessica Szilagyi is a former Statewide Contributor for



  1. Alan Stewart

    July 18, 2019 at 10:51 am

    Thanks, that sounds really good. I do not want it.

  2. L B

    July 22, 2019 at 11:47 am

    Lie…there is people living in mobile homes on that same property.
    And right behind that proposed landfill..are pols homes.
    Also what is going on with commissioners and zoning…it is a process, in which you try to paint a pretty picture for you and your unhealthy, dangers, costly to citizens( although you say we will benifit)
    They are NOT your employees..making it all for you( yellow brick road) attitude.
    Ben Wall..I would love to talk to your wife..and babysit your kids…lol…I need to talk to them.i would like to teach your kids what being a Christian life like and how to be a good neighbor.

  3. Jeannette Roberts

    July 26, 2019 at 8:35 am

    I live in the community of the proposed landfill. This is a peaceful place to live. One of few places with fresh air. Why would any one want to come in unwanted. God is not pleased with the wrong doing to others. Or maybe you just don’t have a conscious Mr. Wall. Wait until it happens to you. No amount of money can make us change our minds. We know what you have said to ensure us. we don’t believe none of what you are saying. Take it to Wilmington Island behind your house since it’s so safe.

  4. E. Kriebel

    September 23, 2019 at 9:17 pm

    He is threatening to sue Commissioners if they don’t approve the permit. Blackmail? His lawyer says AWS spent $300,000 on preliminary site testing. This letter from him states that he did this testing earlier than required. Whatever his reasons for doing that, he made a business decision to spend that money before he needed to. That was his CHOICE and not the responsibility of the Commissioners. Regulations put in place in 1991 for the type of garbage dump he is planning have had no leaks of the liners. Well, that’s only 27 years. That liner is going to have to be intact for decades longer than that. Wall says in his threat letter to Commissioners that he only went ahead with purchasing the property and planning his garbage dump on this site because County employees and Commissioners assured him he would be granted a permit before he made the investment. Name names Mr. Wall, as a resident to whom these people are accountable I want to know who you are in collaboration with.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *