Photo: YouTube (Taking a Stand Channel) Pictured in green is Randy Newman, pictured in blue is Greg Schlierf

The following article is a response by city council to an 8-part (to date) investigative series by AllOnGeorgia into the Brooklet Police Department under the authority of Former Police Chief Doug Meyer (also known as Max Meyer & Clifford Meyer). The series looks into Internal Affairs investigation reports, a series of body camera files, and details over a dozen incidents during Meyer’s tenure in which citizens allege harassment, retaliation, and false imprisonment by Meyer and a few of his officers. All documents contained in the article below were obtained by way of an Open Records Request filed on May 29, 2018.

Part 1 — Fmr Chief in Brooklet acknowledged citing business owner for speaking out against PD
Part 2 — VIDEO: Fmr. Brooklet Chief to Motorist: ‘I’m going to work to get you fired’ during speeding-related traffic stop
Part 3 — VIDEO: Brooklet PD secured warrant day after man filed complaint about traffic stop
Part 4– Documents show Brooklet Council teetered on officer discipline despite findings of wrongdoing
Part 5 – Brooklet Chief Retroactively Issued Citation to Motorist after POST complaint filed
Part 6 – Body Camera Shows Officer Lied to Motorist About Radar Accuracy Check
Part 7 – Fmr Brooklet Officers Under Investigation with POST, Records Indicate Investigations in Past
Part 8 – Brooklet Says Official Documents are in Possession of Meyer, Not City


The following email was sent to AllOnGeorgia by a council member in Brooklet on Friday, June 8, 2018 after the publishing of Part 8 and after officials at City Hall said the city would make no comment. The email is published in its entirety and without edits.


First, thank you to All on Georgia for bringing to light the problems we had with the  former chief. It appears from your reporting that he was functioning  under the premise of an autonomous operation and was very selective in what was shared with his supervisors (City Council), only sharing the information he wanted us to know. I must admit am somewhat disappointed that our former interim chief chose to share, in such detail, this information with you as opposed to the Council that employed him, but I cannot control his actions and I also point out that he no longer is employed by the City of Brooklet as of June 1.

As a small town, the city council is made up of people who typically work full time outside of their city responsibilities and we must depend, to some level, on the city staff working independently. When you have good people, these arrangements work great, when you don’t they can be problematic, as you have so accurately pointed out.

Our decisions regarding the incidents surrounding Sgt. Baker and Former Chief Meyer were made based on the best information we had at the time. So based on the information we had at the time we made the decisions that were made. The unfortunate aspect of this is that the choices we had and the options we were able to choose from were not going to be easy, no matter what choice we made.

During the decision process we had no cause to think the situation was as extensive as has been revealed  because we had not been given information on citizen complaints or concerns. This was largely due to the autonomous nature that the former chief had operated the department. We are unfortunately learning the abuse of roles and unethical actions well after the fact.

From  my perspective, had I any reason to believe the situation was to the level of what you have reported, my questions regarding, and  decisions on the matter would have been very different.

I do have  one thing remaining of concern about the reporting on this story, it is ‘what is your goal?’  If it is generate hits and visits to your site, you have succeeded.  But if your reporting was to expose a problem in the Brooklet Police Department, all that has been accomplished is to reiterate and continue to explore the depth of what has already occurred. No new information on these individuals was really revealed.

What is being lost in the reporting is that the council has dealt with the staff and has made changes to the policies for filing complaints. Given the significance of the situation  and the outcomes , even if only taking in consideration what we knew at the time we were make decisions,  decisions were made  and we could not have been able to please everyone regardless of what we did, including members of council.

In addition, one of the last pieces I read was related to a discussion supposedly held in executive session about a computer.  I was not at the meeting, but knowing the council the way I do, that topic was most likely brought up as  ‘I forgot about this in my report, can we talk about it quick before we leave’ as they were walking back into the chamber. Our attorney, Hugh Hunter, is very firm in his stance on the purpose of executive sessions and does not permit discussion outside of the scope and purpose of executive sessions, so I believe it is highly unlikely that there was any substantive discussion related to a computer in that session. The inclusion of this topic seems to be speculative and is just ‘piling on’ and is not really relevant to the Police issues that you have covered in the previous 5 or 6 articles.

Finally, unlike what you may have experienced in other cities, All on Georgia, or any other media outlet, organization or person is welcome to attend our City Council meetings and to get information related to our city.  We need this external participation to ensure the checks and balances exist for  the success  of the governance of a local community.

Instead of being ‘stoned on the town square’ by the media and the public, going forward I would hope that the media and public first recognize that we are trying to do right for the city, accept we are going to make mistakes, and at times be forced into making unpopular decisions.  If there are people out there who think they can help, or do better, we want them involved. In my 5 years of council, there has not been 1 person interested serving on council and our average attendance at the meetings (ALWAYS THE THIRD THURSDAY OF THE MONTH) is approximately 10.

Unfortunately this is a good reflection on today’s society where it is easy to criticize and hide under the anonymity of the internet, but when it comes to stepping up and taking action, very few if any are willing to do anything constructive to make a difference. In addition, the negativity construed from social media and constant negative reporting introduces bias, real or perceived, that does not entice or encourage participation in local governance.

From my perspective every person on the current council has the best interest of the city in mind with everything we do. We live in this city, we represent this city and we want this city to be the best that we can make it. I will close with part of a conversation I had just today with  Interim Chief Lee Craft, ‘We are not what is out there now, we are better than that and we just have to show everyone again.’

I welcome a response, in writing, via phone, or in person.

GREG SCHLIERF

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
Jessica Szilagyi
Jessica Szilagyi is a Statewide Contributor for AllOnGeorgia.com. She focuses primarily on state and local politics as well as agricultural news. She has a background in Political Science, with a focus in local government, and has a Master of Public Administration from the University of Georgia.She's a "Like It Or Not" contributor for Fox5 in Atlanta and has two blogs of her own: The Perspicacious Conservative and "Hair Blowers to Lawn Mowers."

5 COMMENTS

  1. Seems to me that not only did they not know what was going on they’d would have been happy to have never known what was going on. In one part of the email he states no new info was shared when just a few lines up states they had no knowledge itbwas this extensive until the articles…my favorite part was the statements meant to sound as if they was happy to be transparent with info but they fired the interim chief for giving you info? Lol…OK

  2. What a joke. As if Mr. Schlierf had no means of getting the information about a tyrant operating under his nose in this tiny town. Either he’s lying and full well did know what was going on, or he’s incompetent and was one of the few people in Brooklet who didn’t know. Which is it, sir? Are you lying or are you telling us you truly had no idea? What a self-serving and reprehensible bit of nonsense his explanations are. Cowardly, in my opinion.

    Getting the truth out about abuses within the police department and the incompetence of the city council in apparently not discovering them IS doing something “constructive to make a difference”. It doesn’t matter a bit whether this is done anonymously, on the internet, wherever. Thank goodness the truth is getting out. And yes, it certainly does serve an ongoing purpose, that of revealing just how incompetent the city council was to not notice what was happening and to allow good citizens to be abused on their watch.

    Mr. Schlierf has done a fine job of demonstrating to all citizens of Bulloch County the sort of defensive attitude that permitted what appears to me to be an abusive, mentally disturbed tyrant to terrorize the citizens of Brooklet for years.

    • I totally concur with what you have stated sir. There’s a fox in the hen house of BROOKLET! No doubt about it. Part of the letter even attacked the reasoning for the investigation and story ! ‘Hits to a website’ my goodness but that letter from Mr. Schlierf was an “open mouth, change feet” rant, at best. Cover our asses type of guy he appears to be! I’ve lived in small towns 20 times that size , and EVERYBODY KNOWS EVERYBODY and what the hell is going on! Appears to me, someone got caught with their pants down and are now embarrassed about having been caught in the big lie!

  3. “Secured a warrant in a man the day after he files a complaint about a traffic stop”? Really? Am I reading that correctly? They searched his home for filing a complaint? What an egregious and criminal abuse of power. Losing his position is not enough, not near enough. This isn’t just rudeness and bullying-it’s an unabashedly illegal search targeted to silence not just that particular person but the entire town. These jerks were tyrannical and need to answer for these crimes against innocent citizens. It looks they quite literally terrorized the entire town. Please tell me these criminals had their day in court-they are exactly the type of cop you want to end up in a maximum security prison where every prisoner knows they’re cops.

  4. The photo credit is inaccurate, YouTube did not capture that image, Daniel Williams from the YouTube channel Taking A Stand did. I recorded that image during on of the city council meetings discussing the issues within the police department.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here