Connect with us

Georgia Opinions

FAITH COLUMN: Why you can’t trust the Bible (but you should trust God anyway)

OPINION: Calvin Smith talks about a message that steers Christians away.
“If I were (still) an atheist and I wanted a resource to try and steer someone away from the Christian faith in a ‘friendly’ way I don’t think I could find a better means to do so than give them a copy of [t]his book.”

The following article is an opinion piece and reflects the views of only the author and not those of AllOnGeorgia. It has been provided as part of a partnership with AllOnGeorgia and Creation Ministries International

By: Calvin Smith

Peter Enns’ latest book reads like the average village atheist attempting to discredit the Bible, all the while assuring you that he’s a Christian trying to illuminate you on how to build your faith. It’s basically a re-hash of similar concepts we’ve seen before in his previous writings and reiterates that while the Bible doesn’t contain the truth, you can still believe and trust in God (whoever that might be).

Correct or incorrect beliefs?

Early on Enns says;

“Let me be abso-posi-lutely clear about something so we don’t get off on the wrong foot: there’s absolutely nothing wrong with thinking about God or even seeking to think “correctly” about God.”

Shortly thereafter he explains the kind of faith he believes is wrong;

“ … one that needs correct thinking in order to survive.”

Enns is right that believers don’t need to have consistently correct thinking or beliefs about God to ‘survive’ as a Christian. But the reason why we may have incorrect beliefs is the crux of the matter.

Undoubtedly every Christian (as flawed human beings affected by sin) has some incorrect beliefs about God. That is because of our fallibility and limited understanding.

But what Enns goes on to try and demonstrate is that some of what Christians believe is the-sin-of-certaintywrong is because what God’s word plainly says is wrongnot because of our limited understanding (i.e. it’s God’s fault we believe wrong things!).

Trust > ‘correct beliefs’

The subtitle of Enns’ book is ‘Why God desires our trust more than our ‘correct’ beliefs’. He opines throughout on what he believes is the church’s (and the majority of Christians’) unhealthy emphasis on having correct beliefs and champions ‘deep trust’ in God instead.

Unfortunately almost the entire book highlights all of the contradictions, errors and wrong thinking that Enns says the Bible contains which caused him and many others to doubt its validity as real history!

“Is the Bible’s role really to give us certainty about what happened in the past … ?”1

Appeal to outdated arguments

He outlines “ … four rapid punches to the chin within about thirty years”2 that the Bible supposedly took years ago that prove it can’t be trusted as plainly written.

They are—

  1. The theory of evolution (which proved the creation account was wrong).3
  2. Archaeology (showing the Bible’s creation story was co-opted from other ancient writings).4
  3. Textual criticism (showing Moses didn’t write the Pentateuch [the JEPD hypothesis]).5
  4. Bible contradictions (such as the Bible’s support/criticism of slavery).6

All of his arguments are rather simplistic and have been answered numerous times by various Christian apologists. A search on for example reveals plenty of articles soundly dealing with each of them and it is surprising to find someone who declares himself a believer buying into such weak arguments against his professed faith.

For example in the chapter ‘Slavery: Whose side is God on?’ he accuses the Bible of teaching contrary doctrines (an all too common attack by naïve atheists) where he says;

“On the one hand, slavery in the Bible was a given, and slaves were the property of the owner, just as in every other ancient society.”7

“On the other hand, some saw the exodus story as proof that God is in the business of liberating slaves.”8

But of course the story of the exodus isn’t the reason we know the Bible doesn’t condone slavery, it is because God’s word strictly forbids it!

“Whoever steals a man and sells him, and anyone found in possession of him, shall be put to death.” (Exodus 21:16)

Man-stealing, man-selling and man-holding is slavery. These are all acts done to people against their will. But there is a big difference between this and indentured servitude (which is what Enns describes as slavery) defined in the Bible.

Indentured servitude in the Old Testament was a wilfull arrangement (by both parties) where someone could enter into a binding work contract with someone else to survive in a situation where they probably wouldn’t have in a far less civilized era before government welfare programs existed.

However, Enns quotes Exodus 21:20-21 and equates it to slavery such as the African American slave trade (where Africans rounded up Africans and sold them to American slave owners) when he says;

“I wonder whether African slaves ever felt like God had painted a number on their backs.”

But this is completely out of context. How could a seminary educated individual and Bible teacher like Enns not know this?


In his chapter on evolution Enns admits what Genesis plainly says.

“The problem for biblically centered Christians is that the Bible, right in the very beginning, tells us clearly that God created all life forms with a simple “Let there be … ” No common descent, natural selection, or billions of years required. So if Darwin was right, the Bible was wrong.”2

Now Enns is a committed theistic evolutionist and hence this isn’t a ‘problem’ for him. Which reveals he isn’t a ‘biblically centered Christian’. And he believes Darwin was right, which means he believes the Bible is wrong!

This would mean that God knowingly put contradictions in His word (or else the Bible isn’t actually inspired although Enns doesn’t comment on this directly). But proclaiming known contradictions amounts to lying (which is likely why Enns has a chapter blasphemously titled ‘God is a liar’9).

Perhaps Enns forgot Numbers 23:19 where Scripture makes something clear- “God is not a man, that He should lie, or a son of man, that He should change His mind.”

(But of course that could just be one of those parts of the Bible you don’t have to take as plainly written in Enns’ way of thinking.)

For Enns the truth of the Bible isn’t what’s important, it’s ‘trust’ in God. Of course the word ‘trust’ is defined as; ‘firm belief in the reliability, truth, ability, or strength of someone or something’. So Enns shoots himself in the foot in his basic premise. How are Christians supposed to trust in God if His revelation to His people is un-trustworthy?

Fuzzy logic

Enns’ approach is much like the ‘fuzzy’ emergent church musings of Rob Bell and Brian McLaren (both of whom also believe in evolution as fact). Because of their ‘non-absolutist’ writing style careful analysis is required to prevent being drawn into their nonsensical way of thinking. For example Enns says;

“This book is about thinking differently about faith, a faith that is not so much defined as by what we believe but in whom we trust. In fact, in this book I argue that we have misunderstood faith as a what word rather than a who word—as primarily beliefs about rather than primarily as trust in.” (Page 22)

“Trust works regardless of where our thinking happens to be at the moment. But when correct thinking is central to faith, we transmit onto God our own distorted mental image of God, with all its baggage, hang-ups and deep fears.” (Page 23)

This may sound rather deep and enlightening until you break it down. According to Enns, faith is a ‘who’ word. OK, so who am I to trust? Well, God. But who God is can only be determined by special revelation.

General revelation is sufficient for anyone to know that God exists (because of the creation as per Romans 1:20), but the details of who God is, what He has done in the past, what He will do in the future, His plan of salvation, His character etc. is only revealed in the Bible. So without a trustworthy source of revelation I could not know whether I was trusting in the true God or a figment of my imagination (see below).

Incredibly, Enns spends an inordinate amount of time quoting Scripture authoritatively and telling you what he thinks it means to convince you that you can’t take it as plainly written (authoritatively) which is self-defeating.

So Enns is wrong in saying focusing on ‘correct thinking’ leads to creating God into our own ‘distorted mental image’, it is rather focusing on wrong thinking (by definition) that does so!

What kind of God does Enns believe in?

Enns says he used to be orthodox in his thinking. What caused him to view God differently? A Disney movie on a plane trip!

“A fifty-two second exchange in a movie … And the next thing I know, my view of God flies away as if sucked out the window due to a loss of cabin pressure.”10

Recounting watching Disney’s Bridge to Terabithia he describes an exchange between two young girls discussing the Bible. Leslie (a non-Christian) announces “I seriously do not think God goes around damning people to hell. He’s too busy running all this … ”

Enns describes how this dialogue caused him to be “ … nostril deep in a faith crisis … ”

“How was I to know that the company that gave us Mickey Mouse, Goofy, and Son of Flubber would venture deep into a religious debate? I was just minding my own business at thirty thousand feet over the Midwest and was caught off guard. Me—a professional Christian, a seminary professor paid to think right thoughts about God and to tell others about them. But after a long trip, my orthodoxy shield was resting at my side. I was unarmed, and Leslie’s words hit their mark. In a flash and without words, I thought quietly to myself, I think Leslie’s right.

The idea that the Creator of heaven and Earth, with all their beauty, wonder, and mystery, was at the same time a supersized Bible thumping preacher, obsessed with whether our thoughts were all in place and ready to condemn us to eternity to hell if they weren’t, made no sense—even though that was my operating (though unexamined) assumption as long as I could remember.”

Now the idea that a seminary trained Christian Professor’s belief in God was devastated by a fictional children’s character making such a simplistic ‘objection’ is bad enough. But the fact that the view he had of God was of a ‘supersized Bible thumping preacher’ should set alarm bells ringing for believers as to whether Enns has ever known who God is.

In fact Enns reveals that he believes in a god that he wants to believe in (rather than the God revealed in Scripture):

“ … Leslie’s God was the one I, deep down, wanted to believe in.”11

And ultimately he admits he’s thought this way for a long time;

“ … judging by an old journal I stumbled on from my early twenties, these themes have been my home base for over thirty years.”12

Certain that certainty is sin

“All this to say that a faith in a living God that is preoccupied with certainty is sin, for it compromises the gospel—personally, locally, and globally.”13

But how does Enns know this (he seems preoccupied with repeating it throughout his book and sounds quite certain about it)? He cannot point to a specific Scripture to back it up, and even if he tried to use words from the Bible to verify his claim he has already stated that the words in the Bible are not ultimately trustworthy. So Enns is just relying on his own mind to determine truth. He has become the god he follows.

Enns is excellent at posing questions that supposedly ‘expose’ contradictions in the text in order to dismiss the plain reading of Scripture as valid. But like most modern theological de-constructionists, he never then gives you a replacement interpretive methodology that should be applied except for his opinion.

Half way through the book one feels like Mowgli from the Jungle book, all wrapped up in the ever tightening coils of the serpent Kaa mesmerized by the hypnotizing drone of “Trust in me, just in meeeee!”

This is likely to leave any reader that adopts his ideas to logically conclude that there is no universal way to understand Scripture and that whatever you decide to think or feel about the text is OK.

A wolf in sheep’s clothing

2 Peter 2:1 says “ … there will be false teachers among you, who will secretly bring in destructive heresies, even denying the Master who bought them, bringing upon themselves swift destruction.”

It’s hard not to think of Enns in this way. If I were (still) an atheist and I wanted a resource to try and steer someone away from the Christian faith in a ‘friendly’ way I don’t think I could find a better means to do so than give them a copy of his book.



  1. Leelia Carolyn Cornell

    May 18, 2020 at 1:52 am

    Great article! Faith is a word we so often hear everywhere. “Just have faith,” “Keep the faith,” “Walk in faith” – these are the common expressions about faith that people throw around all the time.

    Please read my blog about The Importance of Having Faith

  2. Brian Westley

    May 18, 2020 at 2:03 am

    Instead of Exodus, check out Levititcus 25:44-46

    44 “‘Your male and female slaves are to come from the nations around you; from them you may buy slaves. 45 You may also buy some of the temporary residents living among you and members of their clans born in your country, and they will become your property. 46 You can bequeath them to your children as inherited property and can make them slaves for life, but you must not rule over your fellow Israelites ruthlessly.

    Non-Israelites could be slaves for life.

    • Sharon M Leary

      July 30, 2022 at 8:21 pm

      I think you need to read all of that in context. The part that you wrote about “buying” somebody might be misleading. The prior paragraph mentions people “selling themselves” into slavery. It also mentions not treating slaves harshly.

  3. Robert Landbeck

    May 18, 2020 at 10:12 am

    I wold suggest that the question is not only about trusting ‘the Bible’ but about whether ‘theology’ , the interpretation of the Bible that makes for tradition, is even a valid human intellectual project? For if all is theological, what has been revealed? As for the Bible itself, one should remember that this specific ‘collection’ was chosen by early roman councils, from a much larger body of material available. Only for the purpose of making this Bible canonical’, necessary for the promotion of an institutional church. So whether the Bible’ is even complete, contains a revelation or a correct choice of material remains unknown. Do we have a true Gospel or a theological counterfeit? History has yet to decide!

  4. Ken Gray

    November 24, 2020 at 1:34 am

    Just a thought, God’s timing is put like this. A 1000 years is a day and a day is a 1000 years or something like that. My point is that we don’t know how long a day is to God. Thus God’s 6 days to create everything could be 100’s of millions of years. That is why both the creation story and evolution theory can be true. My thinking is this; Science has proven that you need at least 2 ingredients to cause an explosion. The Big Bang theory says that everything exploded out of nothing, a big empty void then everything. What do you get when you combine nothing with nothing. You get nothing. 0+0=0 A void is defined as absence of everything. All that said, I ask this: Who or what put the ingredients for the Big Bang there in the first place? The only answer is something or someone greater than us, God. That is my reasoning to prove that God exists. This thought has made a few Atheists speechless in my life. Thanks and may God Bless You, in Jesus name, Amen.

  5. Kimberly

    June 27, 2021 at 6:22 pm

    The worlds job since Christ was born, crucified, resurrected, and ascension has been to discredit the very creator who created them. The Bible says it is innate into each one of us to know the God is the creator. Rest assured, all will be judged regardless of what u believe. Jesus Christ is the only way to Heaven. He said HE is the truth, the way, the life (Heaven). When we pass away, we will into come into the presence of God or go completely out of the grace of God. Each day we wake, is another merciful act of our God who has the power to snuff us out any time or give us grace. Our Holy righteous God doesn’t need any defense, nor does he require his saints to defend Him. That being said, it is not a thing that u can read up, pray or pretend to know God. If you are “called”, “chosen”, you will know that He knows your name. Many are called, fewer are chosen. We walk in a manner of our sinless Christ who died for us and our sins so that our God can see us as sinless and righteous. That is the gospel of Jesus Christ. Our God is holy and just and needs no defense. Praise the name of the risen lamb of God, Jesus Christ!

  6. Ken Moore

    July 17, 2022 at 5:39 pm

    Who wrote 2 Peter? We don’t know who wrote 2 Peter. That’s the point. We point to scripture to prove scripture. Not a very convincing argument.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.